Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Expansions’

The problem of Outland in Cataclysm

September 15th, 2009

Borex brings up a question I’ve heard ever since Blizzard first announced they were going to tear up Old Azeroth in Cataclysm: what’s the deal with Outland? Up until now, continuity throughout the game has worked more or less the way it should: new content gets added on to the end of the game, so anyone leveling up sees the story as they’re supposed to (more or less — there have been a few elements that have had to be “dealt with” for sure, but for the most part Blizzard has just wiped those clean). But obviously, if Deathwing returns and starts messing with players right away at level 1, the whole continuity will get shaken up. Hence Borex’s question: why will level 60s be bothering to go out to Outland and deal with the Burning Legion when, in the world Deathwing invades, the Burning Legion is no longer considered the most pressing threat? Is it logical for level 60s to leave the world, head to a distant planet, and then come back to Azeroth at level 70? Shouldn’t they stay and fight?

Bornakk’s reply hints that Blizzard will probably just gloss over it as best they can — they’re not going to build a whole new 1-85 experience involving Deathwing. When you constantly update a five-year-old persistent world game like this with new stories and content, something’s got to give somewhere. My guess is that Blizzard, being the perfectionists they are, will probably come up with a quest or two that gives a lore reason to go out there (“Hmm, you’re too green to face the power of Deathwing, but our companions in Outland need help holding what’s left of the Burning Legion at bay!”), and leave it at that. They may increase the XP and get you out of there even quicker, but going to Outland at 58 is still a gameplay necessity (Northrend shares the problem at 70, but of course we don’t actually know what’s going to happen with the Lich King quite yet). It’s likely the lore will just have to deal.

World of Warcraft ,

Are we being teased about the next expansion?

April 6th, 2009

So there’s been a feeling in the air lately that some of the blues have been in a bit of a teasing mood. Sure, that’s not neccessarily new, but what is interesting is what exactly they may be teasing us about. For example, here’s a recent post in which one Sulmus of Aerie Peak asks for the Greymane Wall to be opened. Zarhym soon jumps in to say that they would be “out of their mind” to open the wall… then follows up with random ellipses. To top it all off, Bornakk and Crygil jump in with silly punctuation of their own.

Now when Alex and I were discussing this the other day, Alex insisted that they were basically admitting that the Greymane wall would be opened, likely in conjunction with the next expansion. He says it’s already in the planning stages, and the blues are just waving the knowledge tantalizingly out of sight because they’re not allowed to officially announce it yet. Now, at first I wasn’t really on board with it, but then I noticed another post Zarhym commented in.

Imani of Aerie Peak posted a thread with the aim of advocating for more Old World content along the style of the Un’goro detour or Stormwind Harbor in Wrath. With the Maelstrom, she said, Blizzard should focus on fleshing out different areas of the old world, such as Gilneas, Azshara, and Grim Batol, weaving them in with new expansion content to give a sense of continuity. It’s certainly a good idea to begin with, but what caught my eye is that Zarhym himself commented that it was a good post, thus surreptitiously tagging the thread with the air of officiality via blue text and providing a tacit endorsement of the idea.

Now of course, Zarhym’s not a member of the dev team proper, and he could just simply be saying he thinks it’s a cool idea (because it is), but considering his other post, I can’t help but wonder if Alex had a point. Maybe these are ways to say, “Yeah, we’re headed to the Maelstrom and filling out Azeroth for the next expansion, but we can’t tell you that officially, so here, have some oblique references and teasing!”

It could all be wishful thinking, sure. Maybe the blues are just having some fun and commenting on some cool ideas, but still, I’m thinking I’d put good odds on a Maelstrom-related announcement at the next BlizzCon. Time will tell, but I’m starting to feel sort of optimistic.

World of Warcraft , , ,

Quantifying Wrath’s success

March 16th, 2009

The Egotistical Priest has a good series of posts up attempting to somehow quantify whether Wrath has been an overall success or not. Of course, it’s definitely a financial success, but has the game’s second expansion delivered what both players and Blizzard expected it to? Vonya sets out to find out in what has turned into a three part post: you can find parts one and two on the site now, and part three is set to come out tomorrow.

So far, the answer is yes: while the area of Tradeskills is noted as less than a success (it seems to me, too, that tradeskills had more variety and options in Burning Crusade than their current state in Wrath, though that might be because we’re only partway through the expansion cycle), everything else is noted as a win for Blizzard: they’ve really beefed up questing, balance has been intriguing since Wrath (and even if one class has rubbed you wrong, consider how many players came running back with the expansion patch to re-try their class), and of course, Achievements have (predictably) brought the game to new levels of addiction and given players of all kinds new things to do.

Vonya still plans to tackle instancing and raiding as the other two criteria for Wrath’s success (and there are probably a few other ways you could test it — lore? setting?), but by the reasoning so far, Wrath is a win no matter how you slice it. Blizzard has outdone themselves with the second expansion — the only question is where they’ll go from here.

World of Warcraft , , ,

New dungeon maps on the patch 3.1 PTR

February 25th, 2009


MMO Champion has posted all of the in-game maps for the new Northrend dungeons. We’d heard a while back that they’d be added in, and though there was no mention of them in the 3.1 patch notes, sure enough, they’re out on the PTR.

They obviously use the same style as all of the other in-game maps, with labels of each area and concept art of the dungeon itself behind each layout. But here’s something we didn’t expect: each map has a skull placed where the bosses are, so with just a glance at the map you can see where the big bad guys are found. Right now, obviously, we know where they all are, but that will be interesting when maps of future instances become available.

And right now, on the world map, areas get drawn in as you discover them, but we’d guess that these maps will be opened up as soon as you enter the instance (you don’t discover parts of an instance, you discover the whole thing). It’ll be interesting to see, next time we explore some new instanced content, just how these maps can affect gameplay.

World of Warcraft , , , , , , ,